No. 18-7608

James E. Whitney v. Blake H. Chancellor

Lower Court: Arkansas
Docketed: 2019-01-28
Status: Dismissed
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-procedure civil-rights due-process list-of-parties preemption preface standing table-of-contents takings
Key Terms:
DueProcess Privacy
Latest Conference: 2019-02-22
Question Presented (from Petition)

1) Should an Individuals secured and protected Constitutional Right under the First Amendment to redress the Government for the wrongs perpetuated against them be dependent upon ones ability to pay cost and fees to the Court?

2) Does the Eleventh Amendment to the U.S. Constitution transfer sovereignty from the living breathing sentient natural mortal to the World-of-Man Government Constructs; Thereby providing those who serve or are employed in Constitutional or Legislative created positicns or contract therewith, Immunity Protection from being held accountable for their conduct and/or decisions made in the performance of their Public Duties and responsibilities?

3) Should the Courts below be allowed to deny my secured and protected Constitutional Right to Due Process based upon my status of a Prisoner, held captive illegally without my consent and against my will, an "Enemy of the State" and Threat to National Security for my position on Sovereignty?

4) Should the form, formulation, or Construction of pleadings and motions by a Pro Se litigant, no matter how poorly articulated and inartfully styled, providing that they are technically sufficient and contain all the information required for.a prevalent a Tribunal or proper fact finder to be able reasonably come to a proper rendering, prevent a Pro Se litigant from exercising their most fundamental right to address and seek redress for wrongs committed against them by any other individual, entity, or World-of -Man construct?

5) Are not all individuals employed and serving in supervisory roles, be they Public or Private, to be held accountable, and if thereby becoming actionable upon them, for the conduct of those under their supervisory sphere?

6) Is it not the mission and function of the Courts of this Republic to hold those individuals in position of power and authority in the World-of-Man Governments constructs accountable for their actions, omissions, conduct, and decisions made, protecting the sovereign people from which they derive their commission; upholding and executing the restraints found expressed in the Constitution?

7) By what means and for what purpose does the World-of-Man Governments constructs of the American Republic exist?

8) From where can the claim of immunity, in any form or fashion,

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the lower court erred in its application of the legal standard for determining standing to bring a claim

Docket Entries

2019-02-25
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
2019-02-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/22/2019.
2019-02-05
Waiver of right of respondent Blake H. Chancellor to respond filed.
2019-01-18
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 27, 2019)

Attorneys

Blake H. Chancellor
Michael Anthony CantrellOffice of the Arkansas Attorney General, Respondent
James E. Whitney
James Edward Whitney — Petitioner