No. 18-7597

Carlos E. Ponce v. D. Baughman, Warden

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2019-01-28
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: appellate-procedure certificate-of-appealability civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process eighth-circuit-court-of-appeals fourteenth-amendment habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance-of-counsel prima-facie-showing sixth-amendment
Latest Conference: 2019-03-29
Question Presented (from Petition)

THE NINTH CIRCUIT CCURT OF APPEALS DENIED THE 1SSUANCE OF A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY BASED UPON THEIR DECISION THAT PETITIONER DIDNT HAVE SUBSTANTIAL EVIAENCE TO MAIE A PRIMA FACIE SHONING.

DID THE NINTH CIRCUIT COURT ERR IN THEIR DENIAL?AND DID THAT DENIAL VIOLATE PETITICNERJ SIXTH AND FOURTEENTH AMENDNENT RIGHIS OF THE UNITED STATEJ CONSTITUTION?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals erred in denying the issuance of a certificate of appealability based on the decision that the petitioner did not have substantial evidence to make a prima facie showing

Docket Entries

2019-04-01
Petition DENIED.
2019-03-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/29/2019.
2018-10-10
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 27, 2019)

Attorneys

Carlos E. Ponce
Carlos E. Ponce — Petitioner