Whether the appellate court erred in denying Mr. Hudson's motion for certificate of appealability as to the denial by the district court of his motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence, brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §2255, alleging that he should be resentenced without a 15 year minimum mandatory enhancement as reasonable jurists could debate whether or not the magistrate and district courts erred in denying petitioner's Motion to Vacate discussed above?

Whether the appellate court erred in denying Mr. Hudson's motion for certificate of appealability