No. 18-7584

Pamela Marberry v. State Bar of California

Lower Court: California
Docketed: 2019-01-25
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Relisted (2)IFP
Tags: ada civil-procedure civil-rights disability due-process employment equal-protection reasonable-accommodation standing takings
Latest Conference: 2019-05-09 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)

Why do injured workers have to suffer needlessly due to lack of care, medication and treatment?

Why is a specialist's request for treatment denied because of being "Medically unnecessary" by a Dr. of family practice who has no business making that decision? But it is Ok'd by w.c. and is upheld for 12 months!

Why are employees allowed to work in unsafe conditions/environments and when that employee gets hurt they are gotten rid of and no one cares?

Why are injured workers screwed over by w.c.? Why does no one stop and investigate complaints of wrong doing by w.c.? Are people afraid of w.c.?

Fraud is Fraud, a die is a die, a cover-up is a cover-up, no matter who does it, it is wrong. Why is it allowed to continue? Why have the Greedy Bastards at w.c. been allowed to tell Drs. that they must stop treating a patient? That is outrageous treatment of an injured worker and that is a gross abuse of power and authority and it needs to stop. Why has this not been stopped?

How can an attorney in all good conscience take a client, promise to help them and then six months later lie, conceal, falsify dates and information all to screw her on client?

How can an injured worker contest something if it is hidden from them?

Why should an injured worker become a pawn in a bureaucratic nightmare?

Why should their treatment be controlled by bureaucratic stipulations and not for medical reasons?

Why should their plea for help be prevented by the state supreme court because of their mishandling of the case and not communicating with each other?

To pass restricting and denying T.P. injections to severely injured workers with head, neck and shoulders injuries - a wid toll you why! It saves w.c. money and gets more injured workers less treatment for work related injuries.

Why is a State Hospital / Developmental Center allowed to let workers/employee work alone in unsafe working environments knowing full well that workers should not be alone with 20+ clients at a time?

Why are additional employees brought in to work during licensing or when the facility wants to make a good impression? But all other times from 1989 on we had to work severely understaffed in unsafe working conditions. I was unethical by the State of CA. to allow employees to work under those conditions. How did they get away with this?

Why must an injured worker, after their injury, have to seek psychiatric treatment for depression from trying to cope and deal with all of their suffering and no one will help them?

Why is the injured worker the dier?

Why went a person fire an attorney in 2001? Then ten years later hire them back in 2011? Does not make sense.

An injured worker is diagnosed with PTSD due to all of their head & neck trauma, is it still so difficult for them to get treated even when they have an open award??

Why is every request for medical treatment met with a denial and treatment had been proven helpful in the past?

Why is a Permanent and stationary condition for an injured worker at a CA. State Hospital/Developmental Center allowed to continue well over 1/2 years working and then that employee gets terminated because they are too hurt to work any more due to all of their accumulated injuries?

Why is CA run like a Mafia or Nazi State by Workers Comp? W.C. controls everything and are people afraid to go against them so the injured workers are left with nothing?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the state's denial of petitioner's request for a reasonable accommodation under the Americans with Disabilities Act violated petitioner's constitutional rights

Docket Entries

2019-07-15
Rehearing DENIED.
2019-06-20
DISTRIBUTED.
2019-06-06
2019-05-13
Petition DENIED.
2019-04-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/9/2019.
2019-04-09
Petitioner complied with order of March 25, 2019.
2019-03-25
The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied. Petitioner is allowed until April 15, 2019, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.
2019-03-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/22/2019.
2018-12-19
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 25, 2019)

Attorneys

Pamela Marberry
Pamela Marberry — Petitioner