No. 18-7563
Lynce P. Foster v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 6th-amendment civil-rights constitutional-law constitutional-violation criminal-procedure due-process habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance legal-representation right-to-counsel sixth-amendment united-states-constitution
Latest Conference:
2019-03-01
Question Presented (from Petition)
WHETHER COUNSEL WERE INEFFECTIVE FOR NOT REPRESENTING PETITIONER ACCORDING TO A COUNSEL GUARANTEED TO THE PETITIONER BY THE SIXTH AMENDMENT OF THE UNITED STATES CONSTITIONK CN ARGUEMENI ONE TiX1it? flffE..
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether counsel were ineffective for not representing petitioner according to a counsel guaranteed to the petitioner by the Sixth Amendment of the United States Constitution
Docket Entries
2019-03-04
Petition DENIED.
2019-02-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/1/2019.
2019-02-07
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2018-07-26
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 25, 2019)
Attorneys
Lynce Foster
Lynce P. Foster — Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent