No. 18-7560
Marcus Leland Freeman v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appeals civil-procedure due-process federal-courts habeas-corpus standing statutory-interpretation
Latest Conference:
2019-03-01
Question Presented (from Petition)
WHETHER THE COURT BELOW ERRED BY MISCONSTRUING
THE PETITIONER'S MOTION BASED ON BUCK vs. DAVIS
BY FAILING TO APPLY THE CORRECT LEGAL ANALYSIS
STANDARD UNDER CONZALEZ vs CROSBY.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the court below erred by misconstruing the petitioner's motion based on Buck v. Dinis by failing to apply the correct legal analysis standard under Gonzalez vs Crosby
Docket Entries
2019-03-04
Petition DENIED.
2019-02-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/1/2019.
2019-02-07
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2018-08-08
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 25, 2019)
Attorneys
Freeman Marcus
Marcus Leland Freeman — Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent