No. 18-7556
Michael James Horton v. Clark E. Ducart, Warden
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 6th-amendment civil-rights constitutional-law constitutional-rights criminal-procedure critical-trial-stages due-process pro-se-representation right-to-be-present right-to-counsel self-representation standing statutory-interpretation trial-procedure
Latest Conference:
2019-02-22
Question Presented (from Petition)
FX ONS _JUSTiCe so eloQuent ly pot Veo
"Lest We SEHe WWISTI Ch ONL DAT TR AROUND
) Sttouks THE UNE@ViVOCA RLGKT TO
RENRESENT ONES SEIF OR HAVE COUNSe|
ee ler T AHBIGiOVUS 7 .
Z.) StoUia THe RBiGHyT TO BE PRESENT
ANT -N\| (CRITICAL STAGES OF TRIAI
Be lefT For. Heenless CeaRroR. Vv
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the unequivocal right to represent oneself or have counsel should be left ambiguous
Docket Entries
2019-02-25
Petition DENIED.
2019-02-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/22/2019.
2019-01-30
Waiver of right of respondent Clark E. Ducart, Warden to respond filed.
2018-08-12
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 25, 2019)
Attorneys
Clark E. Ducart, Warden
Ernesto Carlos Dominguez — California Attorney General's Office, Respondent
Michael Horton
Michael J. Horton — Petitioner