No. 18-7554

Jack Ferm v. Office of the Attorney General of Nevada

Lower Court: Nevada
Docketed: 2019-01-24
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: attorney-general-misconduct contract-breach contract-damages fair-dealing false-statement gainful-employment good-faith good-faith-and-fair-dealing implied-covenant implied-covenant-of-good-faith-and-fair-dealing plea-agreement restitution
Key Terms:
JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2019-03-22
Question Presented (from Petition)

Whether the court below erroneously held, a false statement, that petitioner had been convicted of a felony, placed on the internet by the Attorney General, which they knew was untrue, and which impaired petitioner's ability to become gainfully employed in order to make the agreed restitution payments, did not breach the plea agreement, or the 'Spirit the contract' through the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing.

Whether upon a breached Plea Agreement by the Attorney General, which has caused financial loss to a defendant The defendant has a right to sue the state for actual contract damages caused by that breach?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the court below erroneously held that a false statement by the Attorney General did not breach the plea agreement or the 'Spirit the contract' through the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing

Docket Entries

2019-03-25
Petition DENIED.
2019-03-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/22/2019.
2019-01-16
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 25, 2019)

Attorneys

Jack Ferm
Jack Ferm — Petitioner