This petition presents a request for error correction. The Ninth Circuit held that the entry of a prior administrative-removal order against Petitioner was not fundamentally unfair because Petitioner lacked lawful status in the United States—even though he was not removable as charged and was not amenable to administrative-removal proceedings. Did the court of appeals err?

Whether the Ninth Circuit erred in holding that the entry of a prior administrative-removal order against the petitioner was not fundamentally unfair, even though the petitioner was not removable as charged and was not amenable to administrative-removal proceedings