No. 18-754
Tags: civil-rights discrimination due-process employee-termination employment employment-law labor labor-rights protected-activity retaliation workload-allocation workplace-dismissal
Latest Conference:
2019-02-15
Question Presented (from Petition)
Why did the Walmart lawyer tell the court that this was a protected activity?
In serial dismissals, as a protected activity, do statutes allow that the work left by dismissed personnel must be charged to the remaining personnel?
In serial dismissals, as a protected activity, do the bylaws allow the dismissed staff to record a "false cause" as an excuse to be fired?
In serial dismissals, as a protected activity, do the bylaws allow staff to be subjected to forced labor before being dismissed?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Why did the Walmart lawyer tell the court that this was a protected activity?
Docket Entries
2019-02-19
Petition DENIED.
2019-02-07
Reply of petitioner David A. Ramirez filed. (Distributed)
2019-01-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/15/2019.
2019-01-14
Brief of respondent Walmart Inc. in opposition filed.
2019-01-14
Proof of Service filed with respect to brief in opposition of respondent Walmart Inc.
2019-01-14
Certificate of Compliance filed with respect to brief in opposition of respondent Walmart Inc.
2018-09-25
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due January 14, 2019)
Attorneys
David A. Ramirez
David Alejandro Ramirez Moreno — Petitioner
Walmart Inc.
Christopher Robert Hedican — Baird Holm LLP, Respondent