as Iweffective and to resolve dis agreements about the Spe cific Legal question

D0 Attempt murder oN A Polide officer Carry A mandatory Ferearmerhanceme

As the F?rearm enhancemew+ properly admitted in Indictment and determined by Jury to Fend defendan+ guilty?!

N As Defendant due Process violated?

S there ANy KiNd of Sound Trial Strategy that would Justify such deticiency Awd rial Counsel pre Judicy by missing Critical opportunity to damage the complainant's redibolety?

LaN Counsel make a Strategre decesion whenhe has not yet obtained the Facts.

PoN could bemade?

N which a decis and Argument in Defendant's Faudr?

d officers Testimony about therr Awards intend toiwflame the passiows of the. ury, preJudrce of the Jury,or divert Jury From it's duty to decide the case based w the evidewce and lontrolling of the Law?

ed Counsel Failure to Pnterview Key witness before trial Establosh Ineffectrive ssistance of Counsel?

ould the out come be different if offcers Didi't testify about therr Awards?

itnesses the Same QuestioNs that do-deterDant counsel Asked?

ras prosecutioN Comment during rebuttal AN Act of prose cution miscoNduct?

i d state commit prosecutional misconduct and violate defendant due prolessAwd ght to faer treal by wot correcting Testomony they Kwown to be False?

ras defendant convicted due to prosecuteow mis statement of Faets?

ad defend ant deserve to be Awurded A New trial due- to his Constitutidnal ghts berng violated?

vas officerstes timony about their rewards irre levant testimony hat cuglify for reversal regardless of outcome due to seriousness?

Whether counsel provided ineffective assistance by failing to adequately investigate and present exculpatory evidence