No. 18-7506
Jonathan Glen Turner v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: circuit-split criminal-procedure dilatory-conduct due-process manipulative-conduct obstreperous-conduct right-to-counsel sixth-amendment waiver
Latest Conference:
2019-02-15
Question Presented (from Petition)
Should this Court grant the petition for writ of certiorari to resolve the circuit split of whether a defendant may waive his Sixth Amendment right to counsel through dilatory, manipulative, or obstreperous conduct, as opposed to express statement, pursuant to Faretta v. California, 422 U.S. 806 (1975).
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a defendant may waive his Sixth Amendment right to counsel by dilatory, obstreperous, or manipulative conduct, as opposed to express statement
Docket Entries
2019-02-19
Petition DENIED.
2019-02-05
Letter of January 28, 2019 from counsel for petitioner received. (Distributed)
2019-01-31
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/15/2019.
2019-01-28
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-01-14
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 19, 2019)
Attorneys
Jonathan Glen Turner
Katherine Windsor — Law Office of Katherine Kimball Windsor, Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent