No. 18-7478
Lloyd Michael Blair v. Michigan
IFP
Tags: constitutional-error criminal-procedure due-process habeas-corpus jurisdiction jurisdictional-defect jury-trial post-conviction-relief relief resentencing sentencing sentencing-procedure sixth-amendment
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2019-03-22
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Are the sentencino proceedinos that was found to be urconstitutionel made to be invalid?
2. Did the 'trial court ebuse its discretion by refusinn to consider the fact the defendant produced a jurisdictional defect which entitles the defendant to be resentenced because he was subject to unlawful constreints placed on his Sixth Amendment Rights to a jury trial?
3. Has the defendant met the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D)?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Are the sentencing proceedings that were found to be unconstitutional made to be invalid?
Docket Entries
2019-03-25
Petition DENIED.
2019-03-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/22/2019.
2018-12-08
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 19, 2019)
Attorneys
Lloyd Michael Blair
Lloyd Michael Blair — Petitioner