No. 18-7473
William Dale Albright v. Kansas
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: alleyne alleyne-decision alleyne-v-united-states apprendi apprendi-rule criminal-law criminal-procedure due-process judicial-interpretation sentencing sentencing-enhancement sixth-amendment supreme-court-precedent
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2019-02-22
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTION 1: DOES THIS COURT'S DECISION IN ALLEYNE V. UNITED STATES, 570 US 99 (2013) ANNOUNCE A NEW RULE OR WAS IT DICTATED BY APPRENDI V. NEW JERSEY, 530 US 466 (2000)?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does this Court's decision in Alleyne v. United States, 570 US 99 (2013) announce a new rule or was it dictated by Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 US 466 (2000)?
Docket Entries
2019-02-25
Petition DENIED.
2019-02-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/22/2019.
2019-01-31
Waiver of right of respondent State of Kansas to respond filed.
2018-12-19
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 19, 2019)
Attorneys
State of Kansas
Toby Crouse — Office of Attorney General Derek Schmidt, Respondent
William Dale Albright
William Dale Albright — Petitioner