I). Dr. Merin, had not made contact with a witness to the Criminal charges. The Credibility of her report would have been considered proper.

2). Can Dr. Merin, get a written letter from a witnesses in a criminal case, for a competency hearing.

3). By law this witness influence making contact with a expert doing his or her report for a level of competence.

4. This hand written letter by Ms.Riggins. referred to a evaluation of the petitioner, that prejudiced his Competency hearing.

5). This witness is actions under a violation of due pracess of law. by contact a expert doing his or her report.

G). It is a due process violation and fundamental error through information in Dr. Merin, report that a fair inference the used of this writter letter in the case that prejudice the butcome.

7). That the expert has been influenced by passion or prejudice.

8). Disprove a fact which was of consequence to the Dutcome of the action. Fla. Evidence § 4ol. I (2oo4 ed).

9). By the conclusiveness of the inferences it may afford in reference to thelitigated fact.

Whether the expert witness's report was improperly influenced by the witness's actions, resulting in a violation of due process