In the present case before the Court, the question is asked if a federal judge or justice condones the following items: I) a fraudulent misrepresentation to a federal court and the outright perjury on the part of a respondent/defendant while under oath with said acts having a direct influence on the legal rights of the petitioner/plaintiff and the outcome of a case before a court; 2) the total disregard of the "Rule of Law", either those of the State of Utah found in the Utah Code or the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; 3) denying Appellant/Plaintiff the right to present "newly discovered" evidence; and 4) that a federal district court judge may, at will, make a ruling based upon "public policy" or "public clamor" which violates Canon 3(A)(1), of the Canons of Ethics according to Judiciary Policy, Volume 2: Ethics and Judicial Conduct, Part A: Codes of Conduct which states that a judge should be faithful to, and maintain professional competence in, the law and should not be swayed by partisan interests, public clamor, or fear of criticism.

Whether a federal judge or justice condones fraudulent misrepresentation, perjury, disregard of the rule of law, denial of newly discovered evidence, and rulings based on public policy or public clamor