No. 18-7462
William Anthony Johnson v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: abuse-of-discretion appeals-court-discretion appellate-procedure civil-procedure constitutional-provisions court-discretion due-process finality finality-principle fundamental-miscarriage-of-justice judicial-discretion legal-finality mandate-recall miscarriage-of-justice recall-mandate statutory-provisions
Latest Conference:
2019-02-22
Question Presented (from Petition)
WHETHER THE APPEALS COURT ABUSED ITS DISCRETION IN DENYING PETITIONER'S MOTION TO RECALL MANDATE BASED ON ELEVATING THE PRINCIPLE OF FINALITY TO BE THE GUIDING FACTOR RATHER THAN CORRECTING A FUNDAMENTAL MISCARRIAGE OF JUSTICE?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the appeals court abused its discretion in denying petitioner's motion to recall mandate
Docket Entries
2019-02-25
Petition DENIED.
2019-02-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/22/2019.
2019-01-30
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2018-11-27
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 15, 2019)
Attorneys
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
William Johnson
William Anthony Johnson — Petitioner