No. 18-7451
Tags: affirmative-defense criminal-procedure due-process due-process-right-to-present-defense federal-preemption federal-prosecution firearms-regulation kansas-law second-amendment short-barreled-rifles silencers state-rights
Latest Conference:
2019-06-06
(distributed 2 times)
Related Cases:
18-936
(Vide)
Question Presented (from Petition)
I. Did the district court deny Mr. Cox his due process right to present a defense when it precluded Mr. Cox from arguing to the jury that his reliance on the Kansas Second Amendment Protection Act could be considered an affirmative defense.
II. Are short-barreled rifles and silencers protected by the Second Amendment.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the district court deny Mr. Cox his due process right to present a defense when it precluded Mr. Cox from arguing to the jury that his reliance on the Kansas Second Amendment Protection Act could be considered an affirmative defense?
Docket Entries
2019-06-10
Petition DENIED.
2019-06-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/6/2019.
2019-05-22
Rescheduled.
2019-05-17
Reply of petitioner Shane Cox filed. (Distributed)
2019-05-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/30/2019.
2019-05-01
Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
2019-04-11
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including May 1, 2019.
2019-04-10
Motion to extend the time to file a response from April 17, 2019 to May 1, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.
2019-03-01
Motion to extend the time to file a response from March 18, 2019 to April 17, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.
2019-03-01
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including April 17, 2019.
2019-02-07
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including March 18, 2019.
2019-02-06
Motion to extend the time to file a response from February 15, 2019 to March 18, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.
2019-01-14
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 15, 2019)
Attorneys
Shane Cox
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent