No. 18-7423

Rodney Washington v. Gary A. Boughton, Warden

Lower Court: Seventh Circuit
Docketed: 2019-01-15
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-rights court-discretion criminal-procedure dna-evidence dna-profile double-standard due-process ex-post-facto legal-precedent perjury retroactive-application statute-of-limitations
Key Terms:
DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2019-03-15
Question Presented (from Petition)

A. tha Ga counk OF Aoviple Vecisind 12 CooMict wir heer
US. Cova o& PAQuns Weses Vrak naz simian mud Slike | pael
Meo One Vwrked Sates Supreme eouck wh paved Acero

B, Vis ume is baeed on a doubly Shaudand a sek oF yee' ples
yermelns spoken oypowrvirtty For OPT Unes oF yeoge
Voy Tot piven yulhich nd Vend diescty oe Weicins Raseuhis

CD Cod crowed etarnchively RW iVe WA CrQinid Steele oT
\iwctnkends | Whenans XS Acusys lo da so ig yueygeded ard

WD eee bs by eManwses Yo Vie rw whith wad bev
Erqacastd Crlun Le Ye Cowduct Prd tesve, aww MSo by Dbl: dippng

De Phe quedina oF whod Cowsbiele & spore WP probly
\ne weuan bees nddneasd by Ws Cound Lun dna gue poses

FE Aollig Mar Sldote of hunteluos
Vy undae oabn © |

Question Presented (AI Summary)

What constitutes a specific DNA profile for the purposes of tolling the statute of limitations?

Docket Entries

2019-03-18
Petition DENIED.
2019-03-01
Waiver of right of respondent Boughton, Warden to respond filed.
Main Document
2019-02-28
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/15/2019.
2018-07-09
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 14, 2019)
Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma PauperisPetitionProof of ServiceAppendix

Attorneys

Boughton, Warden
Clayton Patrick Kawski — Wisconsin Department of Justice, Respondent
Rodney Washington
Rodney Washington — Petitioner