Whether an officer, could have regsonably entertained a good faith belief a bocal ordinance trohibitins the transtortation of alcohol in Public was lawful where, Since Janvaryl, 1957, the, californic Constitution atide xx section 22,has dictated, that the State has the exclusiver nght thae and whereiin a Similar context, two published Cases held that local of alcohol have been Such thart uholding would Proper? be

Whether an officer could have reasonably entertained a good faith belief that a local ordinance prohibiting the transportation of alcohol in public was lawful