No. 18-7413

Billy Dean Smith v. Robert Corcoran, et al.

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2019-01-15
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: alaska-statute brown-vs-board civil-rights constitutional-challenge criminal-statute disciplinary-actions due-process free-speech prison-discipline prison-regulations state-action state-law vagueness-doctrine void-for-vagueness
Key Terms:
DueProcess FourthAmendment
Latest Conference: 2019-03-15
Question Presented (from Petition)

1. Does Full Faith and Credit as defined and as ordered by this Supreme Court in Steel v. Parson Inc., 474 U.S. 518 (1986) at 523-525, apply to Brandon v. Alaska Dept. of Corrections, and Perotti v. Alaska D.O.I.G., Petitioner Faith relied upon in this case as in 11B3-CV-00010-TMBAE Documents 201, #203, #203-1, #207, and responded to by the U.S. District Court Rulings in Dkt.#216 at Footnote 16 and Dkt.#216?

2. Where a 14th Amendment Due Process violation is an unknown officer in a state action is used (DKE.93-1) against a prisoner for disciplinary actions (in Alaska where Regulation/Laws (Alaska Statute 11.76.110) was violated the same as was found in the state prison case of Johnson vs. Herman, 132 P.Supp.2d 1130, at 1139-1142)?

3. Does Carey vs. Piphus, 435 U.S. 247 (1978) "Injury" apply to this case in light of Smith vs. Wade, 461 U.S. 30, at 56 (1983) as cited in the petition?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Does the Fell Faith and Credit Clause apply to the Bradshaw v. Ash case involving disciplinary actions against a prisoner?

Docket Entries

2019-03-18
Petition DENIED.
2019-02-28
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/15/2019.
2018-09-30
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 14, 2019)

Attorneys

Billy Dean Smith
Billy Dean Smith — Petitioner