1a
Petitioner Appolitment of Pobono Counsel?

2.
sumay afimance hen the Chim on Appea clary ied that Distoet
Caunt Judge acted Dith Vindictiveness and wade arguments on behalf of
defendant's then ruled upon those veay asquments?

3.
hearg in oh C
failing to rac t rs o he cla np?

4. Did the dated States Court of Afpeals liolate Petitioner's Human Right

28, aad 3o of the Laivessal Delasations of Huan Rights by qranting
Appille's sumary affionance which denied fetilone's rights to a
hring nnr bC
ba t f a y
the Constitution or by law"?

6"
5. Did the Caited States Court of Afpals Vlolate Petitner's sights to Due
Prer Anent utenCaStat Cin,wn iing
to Con t u Pn un Pn r PanRing?

Did the United States Court of Appeals err in denying Petitioner's appointment of counsel