No. 18-7400
Damion Sleugh v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-review co-defendant-testimony criminal-procedure discovery due-process evidence fifth-amendment first-amendment impeachment impeachment-evidence witness-credibility
Latest Conference:
2019-02-15
Question Presented (from Petition)
Does the need for sealing a co-defendant's subpoena applications end once the co-defendant changes his plea and testifies for the Government at trial?
Do the First and Fifth Amendments require disclosure of a co-defendant's subpoena applications once judgment against the co-defendant has entered, where the co-defendant testified at trial in a manner apparently inconsistent with any trial defense?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the need for sealing a co-defendant's subpoena applications ends once the co-defendant changes his plea and testifies for the Government at trial
Docket Entries
2019-02-19
Petition DENIED.
2019-01-31
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/15/2019.
2019-01-22
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2019-01-02
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 13, 2019)
Attorneys
Damion Sleugh
Ethan Atticus Balogh — Coleman & Balogh LLP, Petitioner
United States of America
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent