No. 18-7395
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: brady-materiality brady-v-maryland criminal-procedure discovery due-process evidence-suppression exculpatory-evidence materiality-standard prosecutorial-misconduct suppressed-evidence
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2019-02-22
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Under Brady v. Maryland , 373 U.S. 83 (1963), does the materiality standard require
that the suppressed evidence directly go to proving any count against a defendant?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Under Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963), does the materiality standard require that the suppressed evidence directly go to proving any count against a defendant?
Docket Entries
2019-02-25
Petition DENIED.
2019-02-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/22/2019.
2019-02-04
Waiver of right of respondent West Virginia to respond filed.
2019-01-07
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 13, 2019)
Attorneys
West Virginia
Lindsay Sara See — Office of the West Virginia Attorney General, Respondent
Wilfred H.
Jeremy Benjamin Cooper — Blackwater Law PLLC, Petitioner