No. 18-7377

Jarvis Harris v. Joe Easterling, Warden

Lower Court: Sixth Circuit
Docketed: 2019-01-11
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-jurisdiction appellate-procedure circuit-split civil-procedure constitutional-interpretation due-process federal-courts federal-law federal-question judicial-review legal-precedent standing supreme-court-precedent supreme-court-review
Latest Conference: 2019-02-15
Question Presented (from Petition)

I. WHETHER THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT AND DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT HAS ENTERED A DECISION IN CONFLICT WITH THE DECISION OF THIS COURT ON THE SAME IMPORTANT MATTER, HAS DECIDED AN IMPORTANT FEDERAL QUESTION IN A WAY THAT CONFLICTS WITH A DECISION BY ANOTHER UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

II. WHETHER THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT AND DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT HAS DECIDED AN IMPORTANT QUESTION OF FEDERAL LAW THAT HAS NOT BEEN, BUT SHOULD BE, SETTLED BY THIS COURT, OR HAS DECIDED AN IMPORTANT FEDERAL QUESTION IN A WAY THAT CONFLICTS WITH RELEVANT DECISIONS OF THIS COURT?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit and District Court for the Western District has entered a decision in conflict with the decision of this Court on the same important matter, or decided an important federal question in a way that conflicts with a decision by another United States Court of Appeals

Docket Entries

2019-02-19
Petition DENIED.
2019-01-31
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/15/2019.
2019-01-24
Waiver of right of respondent Joe Easterling, Warden to respond filed.
2018-08-23
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 11, 2019)

Attorneys

Jarvis Harris
Jarvis Harris — Petitioner
Joe Easterling, Warden
Andrew Craig CoulamState of Tennessee Attorney General's Office, Respondent