Scott Peters v. Nancy A. Berryhill, Acting Commissioner of Social Security
FOuND to Be cleasly And UWMistakABly EeRoNeoUS, Is Evough
11
TO CAst DouBt ANd' stton the trutHt And Fact of All RetitioNers
.SLAdEMENAS.
PETISTONER HAS nO RIgLL TO MAKE DECISiONS OR pAsTCpAtE IN PECiSONS
THat May CHange THE outeomE of His cask: Becarse of He FAt He
HAs no Means By which to contrt the count ore Atoreney or to
PAntepate.
THE HoN Cont StatEd thAL PedTONR Hs No RigA TO
Panticipate or Be Present to presnt Eurodevee or cornict Fsoks.
only Hhe mry krow of Iw te SuBstandinl Eulewee the commissower
Is USING tO SUPPORL HiS DECiSiON. OR PRESENA A TRPUKRSC TOOIW
THE Disthrct BreiF.
THE UNITED SHATES AND THE RIGhA TO CONFRONA WiTVESSES.
And Evidence without Haung His Rights Invduntarly wrvied By
COUNseLwith oUL PErFTIoNERS KvoWldge
THE PETETFONER KNEW THE UETERANS ADMINASTAFiON RePORAS WEEL
EenoRed And was AMowed no witnesses presented who coulls
AteST tO e RUtH oF THE FACS IN the RECORDS OR AMOW CLOSS
ELAmWutiON oF THE paAtS ot He RecoeDs or theViA. USed to.
Form H.3 DeeisioN.
FouRfeenth AOMENDMENt of the UNited StatEs coNsttutiOW to
DiScrinate oN SoLo EcoNomic MeANs ANd teN cHangpetitdNc
Feas Bot Still D.smiss Tte tsqumnt For" Frilune to progecite"whed
Becuse of SolioecoNonic means petitrone caunot Roseante.
Whether the records used by the Commissioner as substantial evidence were found to be clearly erroneous