THGMSELUES ARE MST ARMS OF THE STATE AMO THE STATE OR
DEPARTMENT WAS NOTLIST GD AS A DEFEUOANT
EO EEE E DT
PLAINTIFF CRAY WMEN WE REFUSED TS MEDICATE WIS WCULKIWN
00
IORS SIOA1 NAVLSOAZHS W1SDH S1MVON-O OIO (E
ROBENDN: AMOCOPPEL FAIL B HOTECT PLAIUTIFE- CRAY WUEN
TUIEY IGMORED THE SELIOUS THRGATS OF INMATE CAIL DAETWILLER
B O PUAINTIFF HAM AFTER DGFEUDAT HEWARDCREA TED THE
DAUCERIUS EUUTRDUMENT BY DENTZNG IUMATE DRETWILCGL
ENIMIEU IQL OASA LAWOSOOSAN SIM

1)DID DFEUDANCS HODEN STENT SWZELOS, TAYCORUARPIS SCUUL ROBFCOW
AUD CROEL USE OURCASENC, ONLAOFUCL AS THETR LEASON MOX G
SORATE RAINTIIE CRAY NUD TUCNON-MEOZCATEO PACTWZLCER
TIMGCT D MREUEUT THE UICIOS TLEE HUR BEATING?

5). SIAULD PRISONOFFICINS BE REQUIRED TB RESRALD T ROVERLY
SOBBHETTEO CRICUAUCES TROUGN THE OFFTCIAL CRTGUANCE AROCGDORE
OUCE MN OFFICZA CRIEUANCE- PROCGDURE IS GSTABCISUEO RATHCR
TWAN SEAUOWE TO THWNCT WIMDER, AD PREVEAT A PRISWES EIN
NUACCING WIWIUGR SECT THOUCH THE CRIECANLE PRULESS BT
PENCILWMIPPIUG AAD BAPEL SHUTCINC THE OFF ICIAC GAZGAME
PROCESS?

CHARACTERIZE THE PAITS PLAYED BT DEFEUPAUTS SRRECS AUD
C.M/97999SM1039A1I.A
DENT TUE DXTIR PRESCLIOGD TREATOMENE DFA CNCE SRACE
FOR TUE TOLN MANISCTOLS OF LAENTIA CRAY Z HGAL POPERCE?

SUSHOULO ALAINTIFECRAY BE CRANTED REWGARZNCT
AMOIOR REHGARING EN BANC FAR THE NRCOMENTS
PRESENTED IN ATTATCHED APPEWDIX C, ?

JUDFCIAL QIAS WMEN TMEY ACTED AS COUSEL TD ASSISF
CONMPETENT COUNSGLRROGFENRANTS TCORRECT TIMIGR
CORCTENT CONSEL FDIR OGTGNNDANTS PLGAPZNG, CRONK 8Y
INAPROPRIATCT STRICKZNC. THAG GRZONEOCS FILZNG
BY COONSELFOR DEFEUDAUES WITH SACESTTON

Whether the petitioner should be granted remedial relief regarding the denial of his motion for the appointment of competent counsel presented in Appendix C?