1) DO the PRINCIPLES OF FINALITY COUNT any mORE'ESPECICLLY IN a CASE WHERE HE FOUNDATZONAL TERMS of a"SPECZFICALLY AGREED APON NEGOTZATED FOR CUSTOM PLEA WERE BREACHED. (LAW MADE WORTHIESO! All With No COllateRal AHaCk GROUNDS O DOSO ON! ! THES CASE IS UNLZKE ANY CASE"EVER" TO DATE!)
#2) DO the Couts (ATALLuphold u5AT our Constitutionally PROteCted RighTS TO BE TREATED (TRIED!)AS ZNDIVEDUALS-ANYMORE! EMPHASIS ID, NO COURT TO DATE HAS ADDRESSED THE UN TZME BARRABIE JURZSDICTZONAL FOUNDATTONAL ERRORS.ISSUES OUR LAWO WEKE DESZGNED BY OUR FORE FATHERS TO FLOW TO PROB-
-LEIMS!!" THEY WERE NOT MENT TO BE MANVIPULATED SIGNORED BY. OFFICZHLS TRYZNG TO GET PERSONAL GAZN BY"MANIPULATIVE ..DESIGNS"OUT OF THEM'BY IGNORING CONTROLZNG!JISSUES OF OUR LAWS!"PROBLEMS I AM NOT ZN PRZSON BECAUSE MY CASE DOES. NOT HAVE MERITS! FOR IT DOES!!I AM ZN PRISON/WRONGFULLY! BECAUSE OFFZCZALS DO NOT WANT MY/! CUOTOM.)ZSSUES/GROUNDS TO COME. To LIGitr!
Whether the principles of finality still apply, especially in a case where the foundational terms of a specifically negotiated and agreed upon plea bargain were breached