No. 18-7335

Alonzo Alexander McKay v. Harold W. Clarke, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections

Lower Court: Fourth Circuit
Docketed: 2019-01-10
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: appellate-procedure certificate-of-appealability constitutional-review due-process fourth-circuit habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance-of-counsel missouri-v-frye supreme-court-precedent
Latest Conference: 2019-03-15
Question Presented (from Petition)

Did the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Err by denying a Certificate of Appealbility (COA), due to its exceeding the scope of the (COA) analysis?

Did the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Err by affirming both the District Court, and Circuit Court's erroneous Denial of his Habeas Petitions, due to an unreasonable application of the law, which.wáscontrary to this Court's precedent.-. set in Missouri v. Frye, 566 US.134. 132 S.Ct. 1399, 182 L.Ed. 2d 379 (2012) US LEXIS 2321?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Did the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit err by denying a Certificate of Appealability (COA), due to its exceeding the scope of the (COA) analysis?

Docket Entries

2019-03-18
Petition DENIED.
2019-02-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/15/2019.
2018-12-13
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 11, 2019)
Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma PauperisPetitionAppendixProof of Service

Attorneys

Alonzo A. McKay
Alonzo A. McKay — Petitioner