WhEthrindgen petiONEr's Whie being
Constructively DENrED'appontment of Covnsel on"FIRSTand "ALLother appeals
"DENYING'statulory RIGHT to appeal excuses state courtexhoustion
requireMent, and if "FEDERAL"Distict an"SECOND CIRCUIT"Courts "ERRORED"
in" DENYING"a [C. OA.) to "REOPEN"Lith "CASE" CONSolidatiOn??

a. If "NoT whether petitioner's extraordinary ExIsTING circumstances under
S
28 U.S.C3 aa54

3.Whether Distd Court "EARORED in DENYING pettions reques for an
impartialUNBIASED" JUdge Change and

4. Whether"ALL"extraordinary "EXISTING" Circumstances RENDER pelitoner an
appointment ofappropriate counsel with RELEAsE pending FrNALITY"???

5. WhETHEr"SECOND CIRCUTT"COurt "EABRORED On aNY RULINGSn DISHOMOR of
"TIMELY binding Contracual"ColoRING OF LAW agreements ???

6. Whether prior"SECOND CIRCUIT pane members judicial "IMPROPRIETY"
ξ
COnSTitute a"VIOLATION'Sf a8 U.S.CS 4SSC) () and OR"RENDER"ANYOr"ALL"
Subsequent District an'CIRcuIT CourTs" decisions "VOID"???

7. WhEtHEr "EMERGENCY"28 US,CS a1Ob SUPerViSOry CORRECTIVE ACTION"
ShOULd be"ENFORCED" ONMERITS"n"THIS CASE"f"MISCARRAGE of" JUSTICE
under"SUPREME"Court exersize "PowER" ???

Whether indigent petitioner's freestanding factual innocence showing is being constructively denied appointment of counsel on first and all other appeals denying statutory right to appeal excludes state court exhaustion requirement, and whether federal district and second circuit courts erred in denying a COA to reopen the case consolidation