Are Recusal Statutes 28 U.S. Code §455 and §144 Unconstitutionally Vague?

Must the decision be overturned as Due Process is denied/impossible in the Third Circuit as displayed by evidence of crimes by Judges and facts exist which show "Pervasive Bias"?

Does Due Process require that:

Impartial "civilians" must decide recusal - if there exists evidence of crimes by Judges;

Limits be placed on "term" on the bench;

C. Parties be anonymous (if feasible);

Change of venue be given for review of decisions;

Complaints of Judicial Misconduct must be determined publicly and by impartial civilians;

Any/all complaints of criminal acts by jurists be presented to a grand jury;

Require that transfer of cases out of the Circuit be made for any/all cases of allegations of apparent "Pervasive Bias"?

Are Recusal Statutes 28 U.S. Code §455 and §144 Unconstitutionally Vague?