No. 18-7312
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: coerced-confession criminal-procedure due-process in-re-gault ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel juvenile-confession juvenile-rights postcard-denial strickland-standard williams-v-taylor
Latest Conference:
2019-03-15
Question Presented (from Petition)
MAY THIS COURT'S DECISION IN STRICKLAND V. WASHINGTON AS TO WHAT CONSTITUTES THE INEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL?
MAY THIS COURT'S DECISION IN IN RE GAULTAS TO WHAT CONSTITUTES A COERCED CONFESSION BY A JUVENILE?
MAY THIS COURT'S DECISION IN WILLIAMS V. TAYLOR AS TO WHAT CONSTITUTES A POSTCARD DENIAL?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Question not identified
Docket Entries
2019-03-18
Petition DENIED.
2019-02-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/15/2019.
2019-02-14
Waiver of right of respondent Kansas to respond filed.
2018-11-28
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 7, 2019)
Attorneys
Danny D. Tran
Danny D. Tran — Petitioner
Kansas
Toby Crouse — Office of Attorney General Derek Schmidt, Respondent