No. 18-7310
Kadeem Thomas v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: alleyne-ruling alleyne-v-united-states appellate-procedure certificate-of-appealability direct-review habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel jurist-standard retroactivity
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2019-02-15
Question Presented (from Petition)
I. Should The District Court Judge Issue Or Deny A Certificate Of Appealability When It Enters An Final Order Adverse To The Applicant.
II. Could Reasonable Jurists Debate That Counsel Was Ineffective When Neglecting To Argue That The Supreme Court's Holding In Alleyne Applied To Thomas When Ruled On While He Was Still On Direct Review, Despite Not Being Retroactive.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Should the district court judge issue or deny a certificate of appealability
Docket Entries
2019-02-19
Petition DENIED.
2019-01-24
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/15/2019.
2019-01-17
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2018-12-03
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 7, 2019)
2018-10-03
Application (18A353) granted by Justice Alito extending the time to file until December 6, 2018.
2018-09-26
Application (18A353) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from October 7, 2018 to December 6, 2018, submitted to Justice Alito.
Attorneys
Kadeem Thomas
Kadeem Thomas — Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent