Whether the impositi on of an outside Guideli nes sentence is reasonabl e
when the district court more than triples the already enhanced Guideli nes
sentencing level and justifies it with the same facts and reasons it found to
enhance his Guidel ines sentencing l evel?

Whether the Fifth Circuit C ourt of Appeals' decision affirming the district
court's signi ficant outside Guide lines sentence has so far departed from the
accepted and usual course of pr oceedings, or sanctioned suc h a departur e by a
lower court, as to cal l for an ex ercise of the Cour t's sup ervisory power?

Whether the imposition of an outside Guidelines sentence is reasonable