No. 18-7292
Marco Whitley, Sr. v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: attorney-client-privilege attorney-client-relationship crime-of-violence criminal-law due-process eighth-circuit prejudice second-degree-robbery sentencing sixth-amendment violent-crime
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2019-02-15
Question Presented (from Petition)
Did the Eighth Circuit err by holding Missouri's Second Degree Robbery is always considered to necessarily be a crime of violence?
Did the Eighth Circuit err in failing to articulate whether intentional and unjustified intrusions upon the attorney-client relationship can violate the Sixth Amendment absent proof of prejudice?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the Eighth Circuit err by holding Missouri's Second Degree Robbery is always considered to necessarily be a crime of violence?
Docket Entries
2019-02-19
Petition DENIED.
2019-01-24
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/15/2019.
2019-01-17
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2018-12-12
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 7, 2019)
Attorneys
Marco Whitley, Sr.
Marco Whitley Sr. — Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent