Peter D. Bommerito v. Ralph Diaz, Acting Secretary, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, et al.
1. SHOULD THE PEOPLE IN THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA BE CONSTITUTIONALLY PROTECTED UNDER THE FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT IN THE PRESENCE OF INCREASINGLY SEVERE CRIMINAL COURT PROCESSES AND PENALTIES INFLICTED AND REQUIRED BY THE STATE LEGISLATURE, ADMINISTRATIVE POLICIES, AND PUBLIC ANTI-CRIME INITIATIVES?
2. SHOULD THE PEOPLE IN EACH STATE OF THE UNITED STATES ALSO BE SO PROTECTED?
Should the people in the state of California be constitutionally protected under the Fourteenth Amendment in the presence of increasingly severe criminal court processes and penalties in rulings and required by the state legislature, administrative policies, and public anti-crime initiatives?