No. 18-7287
Lamont LaPrade v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 18-usc-924c appeal collateral-attack crime-of-violence criminal-law due-process firearm-offense predicate-offense sentencing statutory-interpretation
Latest Conference:
2019-02-15
Question Presented (from Petition)
1) To Charge with 924c) (crime of violence) must sustain Conviction with connection, with Predicate Offense.
2) That, if on Collateral Attack (2255), Once Authority Remand, movant is no longer on 2255, because of resentencing, do it start the Process over, Allow if need be And Direct Appeal, "the Commission" in the Course of" 146) r 924) not Charging is not an option. Deny the initial Appeal?
3) when do a crime end when the consummation of a Crime, or When, off the Premises. error? Plainly Error?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the government must show a connection between the predicate offense and the crime of violence for a conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)
Docket Entries
2019-02-19
Petition DENIED.
2019-01-24
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/15/2019.
2019-01-17
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2018-11-02
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 7, 2019)
Attorneys
Lamont LaPrade
Lamont LaPrade — Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent