No. 18-7280
Michael Wappler v. Wayne Ivey, et al.
IFP
Tags: civil-rights confinement-conditions constitutional-rights due-process first-amendment fourteenth-amendment pre-trial-detention pretrial-detention standing three-strikes-rule
Latest Conference:
2019-03-15
Question Presented (from Petition)
WAS PETITIONER, AN INDIGENT PRETRIAL DETAINEE, PREVENTED FROM CHALLENGING PRETRIAL CONDITIONS OF CONFINEMENT BY THE IMPROPER ASSESSMENT OF A STRIKE UNDER THE 3-STRIKES RULE, 28 U.S.C.S 1915 () CONTRARY TO THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES FIRST AMENDMENT PETITION CLAUSE AND/OR FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT DUE PROCESS CLAUSE?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Was petitioner, an indigent pretrial detainee, prevented from challenging pretrial conditions of confinement by the improper assessment of a 'strike' under the 3-strikes rule, 28 U.S.C. § 1915, contrary to the Constitution of the United States First Amendment Petition Clause and/or Fourteenth Amendment Due Process Clause?
Docket Entries
2019-03-18
Petition DENIED.
2019-02-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/15/2019.
2018-10-09
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 7, 2019)
Attorneys
Michael Wappler
Michael Wappler — Petitioner