1. Is petitioner entitled to immediate relief, including prohibition from this Court, to protect the privilege of a Loyal Citizen and Natrual Person from being compelled to respond to Federal Court's libel and complaint for attachment executed against his own person without cause and barred by the Fourth and Fifth Amendments ?

2. Does the Fourth Amendment protect from unreasonable seizure in forfeiture of property proceedings ? (Pgs vii, 6-9)

3. Does the district court err in concluding that once probable cause was determined by the fact that an indictment: was:returned, defendant could not challenge the propriety of the seizure for return of the res where forfeiture was not adopted by allegation of criminal forfeiture in the indictment ? . (pg. 8)

4. Is a defendant charged with an Offense against the Law of Nations entitled to the provisons of the Fifth Amendment's Grand Jury Clause ?(18)

5. Gan an in rem action be brought and proceeded against a Natrual Person ? (pgs. 6-7,25,26, 30)

6. Is the district court required to take judicial notice of a defendant's identity and status as a Natrual Person in a challenge to in rem or quasi in rem jurisdiction ?

7. Is the district court required to take judicial notice of a defendant's citizenship and domiciliary: upon admission of the party in a question of prize capture ? (pg. 27)

8. Does the citizenship of the alleged victim's go to the question of jurisdiction in a court sitting in admiralty where the victim's injuries occur on land ? (pg. 29)

9. Can the district court proceed as a court of admiralty and also as a court under the common law simultaneously in one action ? (pg. 26)

10. Must the district court take judicial notice of the facts that form the statutory jurisdictional basis of the federal action before proceeding to the merits.? (pgs. vi, 31)

11. Is the failure of the district court to dismiss this action and the inability of the United States Court of Appeals to compell immediate dismissal of an in rem action in admiralty/prize court of the type of extraordinary circumstance correctable by 'prohib

Whether the lower court erred in dismissing petitioner's claims for lack of standing and failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted