No. 18-7247
IFP
Tags: actual-innocence circuit-court constitutional-rights due-process habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance-of-counsel judicial-review money-laundering plea-bargain plea-bargaining
Latest Conference:
2019-02-15
Question Presented (from Petition)
Question not identified.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the district court erred in denying Bolze's 28 U.S.C. §2255 motion for relief from counsel's ineffective assistance in advising him to plead guilty to money laundering charges under 18 U.S.C. §1957 despite the Supreme Court's decision in United States v. Santos that the term 'proceeds' in the money laundering statute refers only to 'profits' and not 'gross receipts'
Docket Entries
2019-02-19
Petition DENIED.
2019-01-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/15/2019.
2018-07-15
Petition for writ of habeas corpus and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed.
Attorneys
Dennis Roger Bolze
Dennis Roger Bolze — Petitioner