No. 18-7239
Daniel P. Cannon v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: career-offender circuit-precedent due-process mandatory-sentencing mandatory-term post-booker sentencing seventh-circuit
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw DueProcess HabeasCorpus JusticiabilityDoctri
AdministrativeLaw DueProcess HabeasCorpus JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2019-02-15
Question Presented (from Petition)
1) Should this Court GRANT this Write because the decision of the Seventh Circuit violates Petitioner's Due Process Right, whereas sentencing occurred Post-Booker, but the career offender term was imposed mandatorily based upon controlling circuit precedent in effect at the time of Sentencing?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Should this Court GRANT this Writ because the decision of the Seventh Circuit violates Petitioner's Due Process Right, whereas sentencing occurred Post-Booker, but the career offender term was imposed mandatorily based upon controlling circuit precedent in effect at the time of Sentencing?
Docket Entries
2019-02-19
Petition DENIED.
2019-01-24
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/15/2019.
2019-01-17
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2018-12-28
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 4, 2019)
Attorneys
Daniel P. Cannon
Daniel P. Cannon — Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent