Dione C. Saunders v. Nancy A. Berryhill, Acting Commissioner of Social Security
Why did Nancy A Berryhill acting commissioner ignored and discounted available evidence regarding myself and treating Sources opinion?
Why is treating Sources opinions on issues are reserved to the commissioner Nancy A. Berryhill are never entitled to controlling weight of social Significance.
How Can Commissioner Nancy A. Berryhill justify the fact in for disability due that she ad me the plaintiff.
Why is Nancy A. Berryhill awarded a motion judgment when She failed to provide Evidence proof failed reply claim (briefing), and fail to Documents Court information Out of context?
Why is Nancy A. Berryhill continuously denial to approval for my disability due to health.
Why must ALJs consideration of trust doctor's, any claim that the ALJ's is deficient or that he didn't do a proper analysis must Fail? Due to the fact that the plaintiff disagrees which was not stated nor any proof showing this case it's being not not I disagree. why.
How Could he applied the correct law if he is Supported by substantial evidence and on that other case differently it must give.
Why is the case affirm and Judgment awarded decided they how not the court's undertake.
Why does it must plaintiff claim defer.
Why was no evidence of proof Provided all evidence supported by Commissioner the judgment awarded?
Why did Nancy A. Berryhill ignore and discourteous available evidence from petitioner and refuse to consider their opinion?