IF THE STANDARD UNDER BAREFOOT. V. ESTELLE, 463 U.S. 89.3 (1983) FOR PRELIMINARY REVIEW OF A STATE WRIT PETITION REQUIRES THE ALLEGATIONS OF THE PETITION "TO BE TAKEN AS TRUE'IS IT NOT ENCUMBANT ON FEDERAL COURTS TO DO SO AS WELL IN WEIGHING WHETHER THE STATES DENIAL WAS "OBJECTIVELY UNREASONABLE?" [28 U.S.C. 2254]

IS IT RECANTATION WHEN A FIFTEEN YEAR OLD ALLEGED VICTIM REPORTS TO THE POSFCUTOR POLICE MISCONDUCT, SUBORNATION OF PERJURY, WITNESS INTIMIDATION AND OTHER CRIMES RESULTING IN A COERCED AND FABRICATED VICTIM STATEMENT PRIOR TO HER TESTIFYING?

C.• IS A..FIFTEEN YEAR OLD FEMALE ALLESEDVICT1M DENYING SHE IS A VICTIM OF A CRIME AND. ANY INAPPROPRIATE MISCONDCUT ENTITLED TO MORE SOCIETAL PROTECTION THAN THE SIXTEEN AND FIFTEEN YEAR OLD MURDER SUSPECTS IN TAYLOR. V. MADDOX,. 366 F..3d 992 (9TH SIR. 2003) AND HALEY V OHiO, 322 U S 596, 599-601 (1948) TO PREVENT DETECTIVE OM.ERCINC A FALSE STATEMENT FROM HER?

Whether federal courts must take the allegations of a state writ petition as true when weighing if the state's denial was objectively unreasonable