Whether, the Eleventh Circuit violated Mr. Uces's rights under the Fifth Amendment, where it upheld the district court decision to constructively amend Mr. Uces's indictment for international parental kidnapping by instructing the jury that it could convict Mr. Uces based solely on his knowingly removing or retaining his child, even though the statute only prohibits removing or retaining a child with the intent to obstruct another's parental rights.

Whether the Eleventh Circuit violated Mr. Uces's rights under the Fifth Amendment