No. 18-7206
Christopher Thomas Kegler v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 4th-amendment 5th-amendment constitutional-interpretation criminal-procedure due-process evidence legal-precedent miranda-rights search-and-seizure self-incrimination supreme-court-review
Latest Conference:
2019-02-15
Question Presented (from Petition)
Should this Court reconsider and reverse Schneckloth v. Bustamente, 412 U.S. 218, 222 (1973) on the ground that that it is inconsistent with the reasoning of Miranda vy. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966), Dickerson v. United States, 120 S.Ct. 2326, 2334, 530 U.S. 428, 440 (2000), and the New Jersey Supreme Court's decision in State v. Johnson, 346 A.2d 66, 68, 68 N.J. 349, 354 (N.J. 1975)?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Should this Court reconsider and reverse Schneckloth v. Bustamente
Docket Entries
2019-02-19
Petition DENIED.
2019-01-17
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/15/2019.
2019-01-11
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2018-12-26
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 1, 2019)
Attorneys
Christopher Kegler
Douglas J Beevers — Office of the Federal Defender, Petitioner
United States of America
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent