No. 18-7202
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 5th-amendment 6th-amendment custodial-interrogation custodial-interview due-process edwards-rule incriminating-statements incriminatory-statements law-enforcement-questioning miranda-rights miranda-v-arizona right-to-counsel smith-v-illinois
Latest Conference:
2019-02-22
Question Presented (from Petition)
When a suspect invokes the right to counsel during a custodial interview, can law enforcement officers continue to question the suspect if their post-invocation inquiries are not reasonably likely to elicit an incriminatory response?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
When a suspect invokes the right to counsel during a custodial interview, can law enforcement officers continue to question the suspect if their post-invocation inquiries are not reasonably likely to elicit an incriminatory response?
Docket Entries
2019-02-25
Petition DENIED.
2019-02-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/22/2019.
2019-01-30
Waiver of right of respondent State of California to respond filed.
2018-12-26
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 4, 2019)
Attorneys
Fidel Rios Soto
Alexis Ivar Nicholas Haller — Law Office of Alexis Haller, Petitioner
State of California
Juliet B. Haley — California Atty. General Off., Respondent