WAS PETITIONER DENIED HIS CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS, INCLUDING HIS RIGHT TO A FAIR TRIAL, BECAUSE THE PROSECUTOR'S CALCULATED, SUSTAINED, AND IMPROPER USE OF LEADING QUESTIONS DURING THE DIRECT TESTIMONY OF THE GOVERNMENT'S STAR WITNESS USURPED BOTH THE JURY'S ROLE AS FACT FINDER AND THE JURY'S DUTY TO DETERMINE CREDIBILITY AND PRESENTED A CONFUSED AND DISTORTED PICTURE OF THE EVIDENCE TO THE JURY?

Was petitioner denied his constitutional rights, including his right to a fair trial, because the prosecutor's calculated, sustained, and improper use of leading questions during the direct testimony of the government's star witness usurped both the jury's role as fact finder and the jury's duty to determine credibility and presented a confused and distorted picture of the evidence to the jury?