No. 18-7183
Christopher Jude Martin v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: consequential-damages criminal-law criminal-valuation damages enhancements evidence legal-damages property-damage restitution restitution-order sufficiency-of-evidence valuation
Latest Conference:
2019-02-15
Question Presented (from Petition)
A. Whether there was sufficient evidence that the value of the items at the time that Mr. Martin damaged them was over $1,000?
B. Whether Mr. Martin should be held accountable for a restitution order which may have included consequential damages and enhancements?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether there was sufficient evidence that the value of the items at the time that Mr. Martin damaged them was over $1,000?
Docket Entries
2019-02-19
Petition DENIED.
2019-01-17
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/15/2019.
2019-01-10
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2018-12-17
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 28, 2019)
Attorneys
Christopher Jude Martin
Ashwini Mate — Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent