No. 18-7181
Antonio Amar White v. United States
Tags: dismissed-conduct district-court due-process judge-found-facts sentencing sixth-amendment sixth-amendment-violation unreasonable-sentence
Latest Conference:
2019-02-15
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether Petitioner's sentence violated the Sixth Amendment because the district court's factual findings, based on dismissed conduct, provided the legally essential predicate for an otherwise unreasonable sentence?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether Petitioner's sentence violated the Sixth Amendment
Docket Entries
2019-02-19
Petition DENIED.
2019-01-17
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/15/2019.
2019-01-10
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2018-12-20
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 28, 2019)
Attorneys
Antonio White
Kristin L. Davidson — Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent