No. 18-7178

David Kinh Duc Tran v. United States

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2018-12-27
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: circuit-court-review civil-procedure district-court due-process injustice judicial-error mandate-recall miscarriage-of-justice statutory-construction statutory-construction-error statutory-interpretation subject-matter-jurisdiction united-states-v-clark
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference: 2019-02-15
Question Presented (from Petition)

THE CIRCUIT COURT SHOULD HAVE GRANTED MOTION TO RECALL MANDATE BECAUSE THE COURT ERRED IN THEIR PREVIOUS CONSTRUCTION OF THE STATUTE IN THE UNITED STATES V. CLARK, 435 F. 3d 1100 WHEN IT DETERMINED THAT IT APPLIED TO APPELLANT Mr. TRAN, WHICH IS AN ERROR THAT NEEDS TO BE CORRECTED DUE TO DISTRICT COURT'S LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION OVER Mr. TRAN WHICH CONSTITUTES A MISCARRIAGE OF JUSTICE OR AN INJUSTICE?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

whether-the-court-erred-in-its-previous-construction-of-the-statute

Docket Entries

2019-02-19
Petition DENIED.
2019-01-17
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/15/2019.
2019-01-09
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2018-12-04
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 28, 2019)

Attorneys

David Kinh Duc Tran
David Kinh Duc Tran — Petitioner
United States
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent